Skip to content

Custom Incremental Cache #3239

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

conico974
Copy link
Contributor

This PR add a custom incremental cache instead of the one from cloudflare.

It does not use the BUILD_ID as part of the key for the data cache.
It also add tracing for the different methods of the incremental cache. (This is broken right now as esbuild replace NODE_ENV with development during compilation of the config file for the edge runtime, fix needs to be done in aws)

Copy link

linear bot commented May 16, 2025

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 16, 2025

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 53a3356

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
gitbook-v2 Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link

argos-ci bot commented May 16, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Argos notifications ↗︎

Build Status Details Updated (UTC)
customers-v1 (Inspect) ✅ No changes detected - May 19, 2025, 2:50 PM
customers-v2 (Inspect) 👍 Changes approved 79 changed May 19, 2025, 2:54 PM
default (Inspect) ✅ No changes detected - May 19, 2025, 2:55 PM
v2-cloudflare (Inspect) ✅ No changes detected - May 19, 2025, 2:56 PM
v2-vercel (Inspect) ✅ No changes detected - May 19, 2025, 2:54 PM

Copy link
Member

@SamyPesse SamyPesse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants